Monday, April 28, 2008

Superdelegate Choice.

Either they please black Americans or they win the White House. Those who say that they are now obliged to lift Obama over the hurdle because he has the largest total of delegates and popular votes ignore the fact that their count disenfranchises the Florida and Michigan voters. If the votes of these two states, who in the real presidential election will have a big and real say, are allowed, Clinton would be close in the delegate count and ahead in the popular vote. If there is a "steal" in the making at the moment the perp is Obama not Clinton.

For black Americans, an Obama nomination is a win-win outcome. If he gets the presidency its terrific. If he looses against McCain then at least he would have been seen to run and the bad old honkies would have been seen to do the black man down as usual. I have a lot of sympathy for the idea of a black man being seen to be given a chance. I have even more sympathy for a woman getting the break. That's why I'm for Clinton. Also, she actually has a good chance of beating McCain. In the all important swing states she beats McCain, Obama doesn't.

For me, in a perfect world, Condoleezza Rice would be the next US president. Maybe next time.

Monday, April 21, 2008


I don't think so. Not with intimates like his preacher and his wife. The one gets his congregation to sing God Damn America. The other tells us that it was only when her husband began to do well in the polls that, " For the first time in my adult life I am really proud of my country ". Not very promising. The only thing I think Obama has in his favour , remembering the Democrat's emblem, is that he does rather sound and look like a braying donkey.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Seal Cull and the Canadian Hypocrites.

When the Canadians get bored of lecturing the US on anything and everything and tired of prosecuting their own citizens like Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn for daring to suggest that Islam might be slightly dodgy, they go and find some cute little seal cubs and club them to death. Ten to twenty thousand. They do though hate been seen at it so last Saturday their storm troopers stormed the Sea Shepard Conservation Society's boat the Farley Mowat. The Farley was documenting the bloodbath. " Hit the deck m****r-f****rs: can't have technicolour film of our fun being peddled round the world and tarnishing Canada's saintly image!". Hey. Looks like the skipper is going to cop the slammer and a $100,000 fine. How sad is Canada!? Must be the weather.

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Nice to be a Muslim in Scotland.

Very nice in fact because if the case of Mohammed Anwar is anything to go by, the law will be bent in your favour. On the 21st of August 2007 Anwar was caught doing 64mph in a 30mph zone. This kind of mad driving is usually an automatic disqualification beef. However, when Anwar told Airdrie Sheriff Court that the loss of his licence would make it awkward for him to flit between wife number 1 in Motherwell and wife number 2 in Glasgow, Sheriff J.C. Morris promptly ruled that he could by all means keep his licence. Depriving him of it would be an intolerable impediment to the discharge of his Muslim matrimonial obligations.

No doubt if Anwar had creamed a non-Muslim, the good Sheriff would have lent a sympathetic ear to a plea that under sharia the death of a mere kaffir is as nothing when balanced against one's Islamic duty. Welcome to the Islamic Republic of Scotland.

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Latest Gagging Efforts by Islam and its Running Dogs.

In Austria, politician Suzanne Winter who described Mohamed as a child molesting warlord who got the Koran together between epileptic fits, ( Wonder where she got that from ? ) is to be charged with incitement and degradation of religious symbols. Possible 2 years in the slammer. In Holland, MP Geert Wilders, the maker of the movie Fitna, is to be sued by Dutch industrialists who fear a loss of trade. In the US which has a more robust view of the value of freedom of expression than poor Europe, bad freedom of expression laws, non-Muslim officious officials, hustlers and stooges who are prepared to do Islam's dirty work are thin on the ground. Here in the USA, the religion of peace has to go with its well tried tactic of hurling blood curdling threats at its critics. Seems to have worked in California where Wafa Sultan and her family have finally been driven into hiding. The only comforting thing about these disturbing developments is that the more the Muslims and their Running Dogs try to shut up people like Winter, Wilders and Sultan, the more clearly the odiousness of Islam will be revealed.

Friday, April 4, 2008

Long Arm of Libel Tourists Chopped off by New York State.

The New York state legislature voted unanimously last Monday to pass a law that would protect authors and publishers from libel judgements in foreign countries where
standards are less stringent than in the US. Sponsor of the bill Assemblyman Rory. I. Lancman said " To my knowledge, the free speech protection that is afforded American citizens is unique in the world " So it is; it puts the rest of the world including Britain to shame. His bill, Lancman declared made all foreign libel suits in New York State void by definition.

The legislation was prompted by so called "libel tourists" who sought to have enforced in the US rulings in their favour obtained abroad. Most famously, a Bin Mahfouz, mentioned in Rachel Ehrenfeld's " Funding Evil- How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It " went to the pliant British courts and was promptly rewarded with damages and an apology order against Ehrenfeld and the banning in Britain of her book. We should hold back on the champagne though because the battle is not quite over. Bottom feeding US lawyers who make pots of dosh out of the "libel tourists" are, of course, at this very moment tooling up to try and torpedo the new law.

Even if the will of the New York State legislature is upheld, all would still not be well. Because Rachel Ehrenfeld has rightly declined to recognise the British assault on her freedom of expression, she has refused to pay the damages or apologise and as a consequence can't put a foot in Britain. I find this extremely vexatious; I would very much have liked her to come here and lecture on exactly how Muslim terrorism is financed. I also object to the good name of Britain being besmirched by her 18C libel laws.